Title: Comment on ‘Length-dependent translation of messenger RNA by ribosomes’
ArXiv ID: 1109.3594
Date: 2015-05-30
Authors: Yunxin Zhang
📝 Abstract
In the recent paper of Valleriani {\it et al} [Phys. Rev. E {\bf 83}, 042903 (2011)], a simple model for describing the translation of messenger RNA (mRNA) by ribosomes is presented, and an expression of the translational ratio $r$, defined as the ratio of translation rate $\omega_{\rm tl}$ of protein from mRNA to degradation rate $\omega_p$ of protein, is obtained. The key point to get this ratio $r$ is to get the translation rate $\omega_{\rm tl}$. In the study of Valleriani {\it et al}, $\omega_{\rm tl}$ is assumed to be the mean value of measured translation rate, i.e. the mean value of ratio of the translation number of protein to the lifetime of mRNA. However, in experiments different methods might be used to get $\omega_{\rm tl}$. Therefore, for the sake of future application of their model to more experimental data analysis, in this comment three methods to get the translation rate $\omega_{\rm tl}$, and consequently the translational ratio $r$, are provided. Based on one of the methods which might be employed in most of the experiments, we find that the translational ratio $r$ decays exponentially with the length of mRNA in prokaryotic cells, and decays reciprocally with the length of mRNA in eukaryotic cells. This result is slight different from that obtained in Valleriani's study.
💡 Deep Analysis
📄 Full Content
arXiv:1109.3594v2 [physics.bio-ph] 10 Oct 2011
Comment on “Length-dependent translation of messenger RNA by ribosomes”
Yunxin Zhang
Shanghai Key Laboratory for Contemporary Applied Mathematics,
Laboratory of Mathematics for Nonlinear Science,
Centre for Computational Systems Biology, and School of Mathematical Sciences,
Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China. Email: xyz@fudan.edu.cn.
In the recent paper of Valleriani et al [Phys. Rev. E 83, 042903 (2011)], a simple model
for describing the translation of messenger RNA (mRNA) by ribosomes is presented, and an
expression of the translational ratio r, defined as the ratio of translation rate ωtl of protein
from mRNA to degradation rate ωp of protein, is obtained. The key point to get this ratio
r is to get the translation rate ωtl. In the study of Valleriani et al, ωtl is assumed to be
the mean value of measured translation rate, i.e. the mean value of ratio of the translation
number of protein to the lifetime of mRNA. However, in experiments different methods
might be used to get ωtl. Therefore, for the sake of future application of their model to more
experimental data analysis, in this comment three methods to get the translation rate ωtl,
and consequently the translational ratio r, are provided. Based on one of the methods which
might be employed in most of the experiments, we find that the translational ratio r decays
exponentially with the length of mRNA in prokaryotic cells, and decays reciprocally with
the length of mRNA in eukaryotic cells. This result is slight different from that obtained in
Valleriani’s study.
In recent paper [1], Valleriani et al presented a sim-
ple model to describe the length-dependent translation
properties of messager RNA (mRNA). In their model,
the mRNA degradation process is assumed to be gov-
erned by rate ωr, i.e. the probability density of lifetime
t of an intact mRNA is
φU = ωr exp(−ωrt).
(1)
Meanwhile, the rate of ribosome entering the coding re-
gion of mRNA is assumed to be ωon, and the degradation
rate of protein is denoted by ωp.
To discuss the mRNA length-dependent properties of
the translation to protein by ribosomes, in [1] the expres-
sion of translational ratio, defined as
r = ωtl/ωp,
(2)
is obtained for translations in both prokaryotic and eu-
karyotic cells.
Where ωtl is the translation rate from
mRNA to protein by ribosomes. Since the protein degra-
dation rate ωp is independent of mRNA, the essential
point to analyze the mRNA length-dependent proper-
ties of the translational ratio r, is to get the expression
of translation rate ωtl. Experimentally, there might be
three methods to get ωtl:
(I): ωtl is obtained as the mean value of the measured
translation rate f(t) from mRNA to protein, i.e.,
ωtl = ⟨f(t)⟩=
Z ∞
0
f(t)φU(t)dt,
(3)
where f(t) = N(t)/T (t), N(t) is the mean number of
proteins that the mRNA will synthesize if degradation
occurs at time t, and T (t) is the lifetime of a mRNA
before completely degraded (t is the lifetime of an intact
mRNA).
(II): ωtl is obtained as the ratio of mean number ⟨N(t)⟩
of proteins translated from one mRNA to the mean life-
time ⟨T (t)⟩of a mRNA, i.e.,
ωtl = ⟨N(t)⟩/ ⟨T (t)⟩.
(4)
(III): ωtl is obtained as the reciprocal of the mean dura-
tion time of translating one protein from mRNA,
ωtl =
1
⟨1/f(t)⟩=
1
⟨T (t)/N(t)⟩.
(5)
One can easily show that, for the mRNA transla-
tion problem discussed in [1], T (t) = t, N(t) = θ(t −
2
tpro
L )ωon(t −tpro
L ) for translation in prokaryotic cells, and
T (t) = t + teu
L , N(t) = ωont for translation in eukary-
otic cells. Where θ(t) is Heaviside function, i.e. θ(t) = 1
for t > 0 and θ(t) = 0 for t < 0, tpro
L
= L/vpro and
teu
L = L/veu are the time taken by ribosomes to reach
the end of mRNA, L is the length of mRNA, vpro and
veu are the average velocities of ribosome along mRNA
in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells respectively.
Intuitively, method (I) is reasonable, and actually this
method is used in [1]. On the other hand, method (III) is
usually employed for some mathematical problems. For
example, to get the mean translation rate ω of a process
which includes two sub-processes with rate ω1 and ω2,
one usually does the following calculations
ω =
1
⟨T ⟩=
1
⟨T1⟩+ ⟨T2⟩=
1
1/ω1 + 1/ω2
=
ω1ω2
ω1 + ω2
. (6)
It should be pointed out that, if the method (III) is
employed to get ωtl, the experimental samples with no
protein synthesized, i.e. samples for N(t) = 0, should be
discarded to avoid the infinite waiting time cases. Cor-
respondingly, in the theoretical calculation in Eq. (5),
the average ⟨T (t)/N(t)⟩should be done for only large
enough time t ≥tlim which satisfies N(t) ≥1, and
the probability density φU should be changed accord-
ingly, ˆφU(t) = φU(t)/
R ∞
tlim φU(t)dt = ωr exp[−ωr(t−tlim)]
for t ≥tlim.
In our numerical calculations, we use
tpro
lim = tpro
L
+ 1/ωon for translation in prokaryotic cells,
and teu
lim = 1/ωon for translation in eukaryotic cells.
Meanwhile, the simple method (II) is often used in
the experimental data sta