📝 Original Info
- Title: A characterization of the category Q-TOP
- ArXiv ID: 1112.4315
- Date: 2013-06-12
- Authors: Sheo Kumar Singh, Arun K. Srivastava
📝 Abstract
S.A. Solovyov (2008) has recently introduced the notion of a Q-topological space (and Q-continuous maps between them), where Q is a fixed member of a variety of Omega-algebras, which in turn gives rise to the category Q-TOP of such spaces. The purpose of this note is to give a characterization of this category (in a large class of categories), in terms of a 'Sierpinski-like' object, which is similar to the one given by E.G. Manes in 1976 for the category TOP of topological spaces.
💡 Deep Analysis
📄 Full Content
arXiv:1112.4315v1 [math.CT] 19 Dec 2011
A characterization of the category Q-TOP
Sheo Kumar Singh∗
Department of Mathematics,
Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi-221005, India
Arun K. Srivastava†
Department of Mathematics
and
Centre for Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences,
Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi-221005, India
1
Introduction
E.G. Manes in [2] gave a somewhat ‘axiomatic’ characterization (upto isomor-
phism) of the category TOP of topological spaces, among a certain class of
categories, satisfying some conditions, in which a Sierpinski space-like object,
played a key role. Following that, the category [0, 1]-TOP of [0, 1]-topological
spaces (known more commonly as ‘fuzzy’ topological spaces) was analogously
characterized by Srivastava [4]. S.A. Solovyov [3] has recently introduced the no-
tion of Q-topological spaces (Q being a fixed member of a variety of Ω-algebras).
In this note, we give a characterization of the category Q-TOP of Q-topological
spaces in which the so-called Q-Sierpinski space, introduced in [3], plays a key
role.
2
The category Q-TOP
We begin by recalling the (well-known) notions of Ω-algebras and their homo-
morphisms. For details, see [1].
∗sheomathbhu@gmail.com
†arunksrivastava@gmail.com
1
Definition 2.1 ([3])
• Let Ω= (nλ)λ∈I be a class of cardinal numbers. An Ω-algebra is a pair
(A, (ωA
λ )λ∈I) consisting of a set A and a family of maps ωA
λ : Anλ →A.
Any B(̸= φ) ⊆A is called a subalgebra of (A, (ωA
λ )λ∈I) if for any λ ∈I
and any (bi)i∈nλ ∈Bnλ, ωA
λ ((bi)i∈nλ) ∈B. Given S ⊆A, the intersection
of all the subalgebras of (A, (ωA
λ )λ∈I) containing S is clearly a subalgebra
of (A, (ωA
λ )λ∈I). We shall denote it as < S >.
• Given (A, (ωA
λ )λ∈I) and (B, (ωB
λ )λ∈I), a map f : A →B is called an
Ω-algebra homomorphism if for every λ ∈I the following diagram
commutes:
Anλ
ωA
λ
f nλ / Bnλ
ωB
λ
A
f
/ B
.
Let Alg(Ω) denote the category of Ω-algebras and Ω-algebra homomor-
phisms.
• A variety of Ω-algebras is a full subcategory of Alg(Ω) which is closed
under the formation of products 1, subalgebras and homomorphic images.
Throughout, Q denotes a fixed member of a fixed variety of
Ω-algebras.
• Given a set X, a subset τ of QX is called a Q-topology on X if τ is a
subalgebra of QX; in such a case, the pair (X, τ) is called a Q-topological
space.
• Given two Q-topological spaces (X, τ) and (Y, η), a Q-continuous func-
tion from (X, τ) to (Y, η) is a function f : X →Y such that f ←(α) ∈
τ, ∀α ∈η, where f ←(α) = α ◦f.
It is evident that all Q-topological spaces, together with Q-continuous
maps, form a category, which we shall denote as Q-TOP.
The following categorical concepts are from Manes [2]
Definition 2.2 ([2])
1. A category C of sets with structure is defined through the follow-
ing descriptions of its objects (‘C-structured sets’) and morphisms (‘C-
admissible maps’), satisfying the two axioms given below:
A class C(X) of ‘C-structures’ is assigned with each set X and a ‘C-
structured set’ is a pair (X, s), with s ∈C(X).
1The category Alg(Ω) is closed under products
2
A subset C(s, t) of the set of all functions from X to Y is assigned with
each pair of C-structured sets (X, s) and (Y, t) and a ‘C-admissible map’
from (X, s) to (Y, t) is any f ∈C(s, t) (in which case we write “f :
(X, s) →(Y, t)”).
The axioms are:
Axiom A1: If f : (X, s) →(Y, t) and g : (Y, t) →(Z, u) then also
g ◦f : (X, s) →(Z, u).
Axiom A2: Given a bijection f : X →Y and t ∈C(Y ), there exists a
unique s ∈C(X) such that f : (X, s) →(Y, t) and f −1 : (Y, t) →(X, s).
2. Given a category C of structures (as defined above), a family F = {fj :
(X, s) →(Yj, tj)|j ∈J} of C-admissible maps is said to be optimal if for
each C-structured set (Z, u) and a function g : Z →X, g : (Z, u) →(X, s)
ifffj ◦g : (Z, u) →(X, s), ∀j ∈J. Further, if for a family F = {fj :
X →(Yj, tj)|j ∈J} of functions, where X is a set and each (Yj, tj) is a
C-structured set, there exists s ∈C(X) such that the family {fj : (X, s) →
(Yj, tj)|j ∈J} is optimal, then s is called an optimal lift of the family
F.
3. An object S = (S, u) in a category C of sets with structure is called a
Sierpinski object if for every C-object X = (X, s), the family of all
C-admissible maps from X to S is optimal.
Remark 2.1 It is easy to verify that, in Q-TOP, the optimal lift of a family
F = {fj : X →(Yj, tj)|j ∈J} of functions, where X is a set and each (Yj, tj)
is a Q-TOP-object, is precisely the smallest Q-topology on X making each fi
Q-continuous.
Both TOP and [0, 1]-TOP are categories of sets with structures and
the usual two-point Sierpinski space and the fuzzy Sierpinski space (of [4]) are
Sierpinski objects in these categories.
We verify (on expected lines) that Q-TOP is also a category of sets
with structures. For each set X, C(X) is the family of all Q-topologies on X
and the C-admissible maps are just the Q-continuous maps. Given a bijection
f : X →Y and t ∈C(Y ), there exists a unique s ∈C(X), namely s =< A >,
with A = {q ◦f|q ∈t}, such that both f : (X, s)
Reference
This content is AI-processed based on open access ArXiv data.