Goonhilly Sparklers
📝 Original Info
- Title: Goonhilly Sparklers
- ArXiv ID: 1110.4044
- Date: 2011-10-19
- Authors: Aris Karastergiou and Mark Walker
📝 Abstract
Flux monitoring of compact radio quasars has revealed dramatic radio-wave lensing events which challenge our understanding of the interstellar medium. However, the data on these events remain very sparse. Here we consider how the Goonhilly radio astronomical facility can make an impact on this problem by dedicating one or more dishes to flux monitoring for a period of one year. Such an experiment would be able to identify \sim6 new events and study them in detail.💡 Deep Analysis

📄 Full Content
Because of the difficulty in understanding ESEs within a conventional picture of the ISM, we have previously proposed that they are caused by baryonic dark matter (Walker 2007;Walker and Wardle 1998): cold, dense, AUsized molecular clouds ramming their way through the ISM at high speeds.
ESEs merit further study. Unfortunately there has been no substantial new dataset since the original work of Fiedler et al (1987Fiedler et al ( ,1994) ) using the Green Bank Interferometer. Within the next five years that situation will change drastically as SKA-pathfinder instruments are brought into service. In particular the Variables And Slow Transients (VAST) project, which utilises the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP: Johnston, Feain and Gupta 2009), will survey a large fraction of the sky on a daily basis. But ASKAP only operates efficiently up to 1.5 GHz, whereas the data we have on ESEs are at 2.7 GHz and above, making it difficult to plan for ESE science with VAST. With Goonhilly we will change that, by discovering a number of new events using 5 GHz data and then studying them at lower frequencies. In the process we will gain some powerful new insights into the physics of ESEs.
The Goonhilly Earth Station, in Cornwall, UK, was formerly a telecommunications facility. On site are three 30m dishes and some smaller (15m) antennas. The Consortium of Universities for Goonhilly Astronomy plans to instrument two of the 30m dishes for radio astronomy, potentially including various frequency bands within the 1 to 10 GHz range.
In this paper we outline the possibilities for ESE science which may be opened up by operating Goonhilly as an astronomical facility. We consider two hypothetical instruments: C 1 : a single 30m dish equipped with a 5 GHz receiver having 1 GHz bandwidth C 2 : a pair of 15m dishes operating as an interferometer and receiving across the full 4 to 8 GHz band simultaneously.
To find ESEs we need to monitor the fluxes of a large number of compact radio sources. The combined probability of the two most striking ESEs (those in Q0954+658 and Q1749+096) is ∼ 5 × 10 -4 , so that in a sample of 2,000 extragalactic sources there will typically be one ESE in progress at any given moment. And the event durations are ∼ 2 months, so the event rate in a sample of 2,000 sources is ∼ 6 year -1 .
For daily, year-round monitoring we need to choose sources which are away from the ecliptic. Restricting ourselves to the region with ecliptic latitude greater than 30 • means that we have π steradians available, in principle. But the reality of an alt-az mount is that it can take a long time to slew between sources which are North of the zenith, and those to the South, whereas we need to minimise overheads associated with slewing. The latitude of Goonhilly is approximately 50 • and we therefore restrict Fig. 1. The best example of an Extreme Scattering Event: that detected in the source Q0954+658, at 8.1 GHz (top curve) and 2.7 GHz (lower curve), from Fiedler et al (1987). An offset of +1 Jy has been added to the high-frequency data for clarity of presentation. These data taken from http://ese.nrl.navy.mil/ .
ourselves to the 1.5 sr between declination 50 • and the North Celestial Pole.
Our program sources must be compact, in order that they can be significantly magnified, so only about one in 5 radio sources will be suitable for our purposes. (Compact sources can be selected on the basis of their radio spectra, which should be inverted or at least flat.) To assemble a sample of 2,000 compact sources we must therefore range down to S min ≃ 35 mJy, where the areal density of all radio sources is approximately 6,000 sr -1 at 5 GHz (Wall 1994).
Assuming that the receiver is a clone of the C-BASS system the flux noise for C 1 should be approximately 4 mJy √ s. To detect magnification changes of order 10% with high confidence requires a signal-to-noise ratio of at least 30, which would be achieved in about 12 seconds for a 35 mJy source. (The brightest confusing source in the beam will typically be 0.8 mJy, and this source will normally be steady and will not be detrimental to our study.) Thus the total required on-source time is less than 7 hours per epoch for a sample of 2,000 targets. To this we must add the time required for slewing and settling.
The typical angular separation between targets is less than 2 • . That is not a long slew and it seems reasonable to expect that t
📸 Image Gallery
