Blocking Sets in the complement of hyperplane arrangements in projective space
It is well know that the theory of minimal blocking sets is studied by several author. Another theory which is also studied by a large number of researchers is the theory of hyperplane arrangements. We can remark that the affine space $AG(n,q)$ is th…
Authors: ** S. Settepanella (소속: Dipartimento di Scienze della Comunicazione, Colle Parco, 64100 Teramo
Blo c king Sets in the complemen t of h yp erplane arrangemen ts in pro jectiv e space S. Settepanella ∗ Jan uary 200 8 Abstract It is w ell kn o w that the theory of minimal blo cking sets is studied by sever al aut h or. Another theory whic h is also studied by a large num b er of researc h ers is t he theory of h y p erplane arrangements. W e can remark that the affine space AG ( n, q ) is the complemen t of the line at infinity in P G ( n, q ). Then AG ( n, q ) can b e regarded as the complement of an hyperplane arrangement in P G ( n, q )! Therefore the study of b locking sets in the affine space AG ( n, q ) is simply the study of blo cking sets in the complement of a fin ite arrangemen t in P G ( n, q ). In this paper the author generalizes this remark starting to stu dy the p roblem of existence of blo cking sets in the complement of a given hyp erplane arrangement in P G ( n, q ). As an example she solves the problem for the case of braid arrangemen t. Moreo ver she poses significan t questions on this new and interes t in g problem. 1 In tro d uction Throughout this pap er, P G ( n, q ) and AG ( n, q ) will res p ectively denote the n- dimensional pro jective and a ffine space over the finite field GF ( q ). A t-blo cking set B in P G ( n, q ) (or AG ( n, q )) is a set B of p oints such that any ( n − t )-dimensional subspace intersects B . A 1-blo cking set is simply called a blo cking set . A t -blo cking set is called minimal , if none of its prop er subs e ts is also a t -blo cking set. The smallest t - blo cking sets hav e b e en characterized by Bo se a nd Bur ton [2]. They proved that the smallest t -blo cking sets in P G ( n, q ) are subspace of dimension t . An old r esult of Bruen [3] states that the second s ma llest minimal blo cking set in the plane P G (2 , √ q ), q a squar e , is (the p oint set) o f a Baer subplane P G (2 , √ q ). There are several survey pap er s ab out blo cking sets (see Sz˜ onyi, G´ acs, W einer [6] and c ha pter 13 of the second editio n of Hirs chf e ld’s b o ok [7 ]). Most of the surveys concentrate on small minimal blo cking sets. But there are also several results ab out lar ge minimal blo c k ing sets. The fir st such result is due to Bruen and Thas [4]. More results on the spectrum of minimal blocking sets in planes of small order can be found in Cossidente, G´ acs et alt [5] Innamorati [8],Inamorati and Maturo [9]. ∗ Dipartiment o di Scienze della Com unicazione,Colle Parco, 641 00 T eramo, Italy 1 Another interesting problem is the existence of minimal Blo cking sets in P G ( n, q ) and AG ( n, q ) for fixed n and q (s e e Mazzo cca-T allini [10] and Beutelspacher- Eugeni [1]). It is w ell know that the theory of minimal blo cking sets is studied b y several author. There is another theory which is also studied by a large num b er of resear chers: the theor y of hyperpla ne arrang ements (see the Orlik-T erao’s bo ok [11] for a survey o n the theor y). An hyperpla ne a rrang e ment is a set o f hyper plane in a given space. The author r emarks that the affine space AG ( n, q ) is the complement of the line at infinity in P G ( n, q ). Then AG ( n, q ) ca n b e regarded a s the complement of a n h yp er plane arr angement in P G ( n, q )! Therefore the study o f blo cking se ts in the affine space AG ( n, q ) is simply the study o f blocking sets in the complement of a finite a rrang ement in P G ( n, q ). The author generalized this remar k studying the problem of the existence of blo cking sets in the complement of a given hyperplane arrangement in P G ( n, q ). In this pap er a uthor intro duces the first results on this new theory , she generalizes so me results of the old theory to the new one. Moreov er she solves the problem o f existence o f blo cking sets in the c omple- men t of a well-known and studied arrang ement: the br aid arr angement , the set of r e flection hyperplane s g enerated by the sy mmetr ic gro up. She concludes the pap er pos ing several questions: 1. on the existence of blo cking sets on the complement of hyperplane a r - rangements; 2. on the c ha racteriza tion of h yp er plane arr angements in P G ( n, q ) which give rise to in teres ting new pro blem on blocking sets; 3. on the link b etw een the tw o theor ies. Clearly also the problem o f small and large blocking sets ca n be s tudied again in the complement of a given hyper plane arra ngement. The author is still working to this problem. Plainly in this pap er author writes blocking s ets instead of min imal blocking sets. 2 General results on Blo c king sets Let P G ( n, q ) ( AG ( n, q )) the n-dimensional pro jective (affine) space o ver a finite field GF ( q ). W e hav e the following: Prop ositi on 1 L et C b e a blo cking set in P G ( n, q ) ( AG ( n, q ) ) with n > 2 and S d a s u bsp ac e of dimension d > 1 , then the interse ction C ∩ S d is a blo cking set in S d . Prop ositi on 2 L et S n − 1 an hyp erplane in P G ( n, q ) ( n > 2 ). If C 1 is a blo cking set in AG ( n, q ) = P G ( n, q ) \ S r − 1 and C 2 is a blo cking set in S r − 1 , then C 1 ∪ C 2 is a blo cking set in P G ( n, q ) . Corollary 1 If P G ( n, q ) and AG ( n +1 , q ) c ontain blo cking s et s then also PG ( r + 1 , q ) do es. 2 The pro of o f the ab ove statements is trivial. Mazzo cca and T allini in [10] prov ed the following: Theorem 1 Ther e is a function b p ( t, q ) ( b a ( t, q ) ), dep ending on t and q, such that P G ( n, q ) ( AG ( n, q ) ) c ontains t-blo cking sets if and only if r ≤ b p ( t, q ) ( r ≤ b a ( t, q ) ). Another interesting genera l r esult on exis tence of blocking set is the follow- ing: Theorem 2 (A. Beutelsp acher-F. Eugeni [1 ]). L et P G ( n, q ) and AG ( n, q ) b e the pr oje ctive and affine n-dimensional sp ac e over a finite field GF ( q ) . If q ≥ 2 n then AG ( n, q ) and P G ( n, q ) c ontains t-blo cking s et s. 3 Blo cki n g sets on the complemen t of h yp er- plane arrangemen ts in PG (n,q) In this sectio n we g eneralize some interesting results on Blo c king Sets in P G ( n, q ) to the c omplement o f hyperpla ne a rrang ement s. Let A = { H 1 , . . . , H m } b e an arr angement of hyp erplanes in P G ( n, q ) and M ( A ) = P G ( n, q ) \ ∪ i =1 ,...m H i be the c omplement of the arrangement. Let A a = { H 1 , . . . , H m } b e an arra ngement in AG ( n, q ) and M a ( A ) = AG ( n, q ) \ ∪ i =1 ,...m H i be the co mplement in the affine s pace. Given an a rrang ement A in P G ( n, q ) ( AG ( n, q )), the c orr esp onding arr ange- ment in P G ( k , q ) ( AG ( k, q )) for k 6 = n is the arra ngement given b y hyperplanes with the same equatio ns of thos e in A . F rom now on we will a lso use A to r efer to corr esp onding arr angements of A . Let us r emarks that the statemen ts of pro p ositions 1, 2 and co r ollary 1 a b ov e hold trivially also for Blo cking sets in the complements M ( A ) ⊂ P G ( n, q ) and M a ( A ) ⊂ AG ( n, q ). Moreov er we hav e the g eneralizatio n o f Mazzo cca-T allini’s theor em: Theorem 3 L et M ( A ) b e the c omplement of an arr angement A in the pr oje c- tive (affine) sp ac e P G ( n, q ) ( AG ( n, q ) ). Then we c an find a function b p, A ( t, q ) ( b a, A ( t, q ) ), dep ending on t and q, such t hat M ( A ) ⊂ P G ( n, q ) ( M ( A ) ⊂ AG ( n, q ) ) has t-blo cking sets if and only if r ≤ b p, A ( t, q ) ( r ≤ b a, A ( t, q ) ). Pro of Let d M ( A ( n,q )) be the maxim um of the dimensions of linear subspaces in M ( A ( n, q )). Then, by simple geometr ic considera tion, we remar k that { d M ( A ( n,q )) : n ∈ N } is an increas ing function. Let us suppo se tha t { r n : n ∈ N } is a sequence of in teg er suc h that for all r n there is an h - blo c k ing set B ( r n ) in M ( A ( n, q )). Then fo r d M ( A ( r n ,q )) > h let B ( r n ) ∩ S ( r n ) b e the intersection b etw een B ( r n ) and a linear v a riety S ( r n ) in M ( A ( r n , q )) of dimension d M ( A ( r n ,q )) . Then 3 B ( r n ) ∩ S ( r n ) is an h -blo cking set in S ( r n ), but this co ntradicts theor em 1. The braid arrangement Let us consider the Br aid arr angement A ( A n,q ) = { H i,j } 1 ≤ i
Original Paper
Loading high-quality paper...
Comments & Academic Discussion
Loading comments...
Leave a Comment